November started out busy for me and mine. Joanne, Alex and I
went to "Punkin
Chunkin." It was our first time going, and it was a blast. Over 100
machines have been constructed for the express purpose of seeing which can
throw a pumpkin the furthest. This sport has already matured to several
divisions. Youth, Trebuchet, Centrifuge, Catapult, Ladies, and Cannon.
I love to watch the mechanism of a trebuchet go through its
paces. And the biggest trebuchet there was named
Yankee Siege. A 46,000 pound monster that can throw 300 pounds of
anything hundreds of feet, and a 8 pound pumpkin over 1,600 feet. Following
closely behind that distance were the torsion catapult Onager (Latin for wild
donkey) and the spring loaded Fibonacci.
But the big guns of the event were, the BIG GUNS. There
literally was a forest of cannons on the field. Some of the smaller ones were
easily 30 feet long. Assuming a diameter of 10 inches, that would give them a
caliber of 36. However, standing at 50 degrees, were two guns that stood out. I
later found out they were “2nd Amendment” and 2nd Amendment Too.” Their website
stated their barrels were 21cm diameter and 100 feet long. 30 feet longer than
the famous German rail gun Leopold, otherwise known as Anzio Annie.
Then, just beginning its ascent into the sky, was the most
massive machine yet. With a mission statement that clearly stated “Bigger is
Better,” rose "Fire
and Ice." With a barrel of 153 feet, it dwarfed the 2nd Amendment's by
at 50%.
 |
| Leopold, aka Anzio Annie |
| One of two German 28cm rail guns used against the Allied
beach head at Anzio. |
As photographed by the author.
Used with permission from the US Army Ordnance Museum.
|
While we watch tons of pumpkins getting smashed to seed, I couldn’t help but
wonder some of the aspects of the gunnery. At what caliber does friction of the
barrel override thrust of the expanding air? In WWII it was around 70 caliber.
Since the winner this year was “Big 10 Inch”, which had the 4th longest barrel,
this still may be the case. What angle is best for range? It judging from the
gun line, about 50 degrees, but there were a few dissenters, at 40 degrees or
so. How do you transport these things? Many barrels were transported in
sections. Some of the guns were towed, and some, notably two converted school
busses, were self propelled.
But my longest musings was on the name 2nd Amendment. This is what the Founding
Fathers meant. An armed citizenry capable of taking on enemy forces. In the
1700’s a soldiers weapon was little different from a private musket. Cannons
could be made a local foundries. Only training differentiated the citizens from
the soldiers. Over the years, we lost the meaning of "A well-regulated Militia
being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to
keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." It meant the citizens should
have access to all the weapons available to the military. And here in Delaware
are private citizens with a private, if somewhat corporate sponsored, artillery
park.
WBC 2007 Battlegroup™ Recap
Battlegroup™
was expanded to four qualifying heats this year. Fred Gosnell qualified in the
first heat, turning in three straight wins. Marc Baeuregard qualified in the
second heat with two wins and a loss to the game's designer, Jeff Billings.
Chris Czyryca, the 2006 world champion, qualified in the third heat. At this
point all three finalist were expert players but Battlegroup™
is easy to learn and capricious by nature and the fourth heat was won by a
player new to the game, Andrew Fedin. Positions 5 and 6 on the leader board
went to Bruno Passacantando and George Deutsch, who had the best non-qualifying
scores.
 |
| Marc Baeuregard on the left with Andrew Fedin on the right. |
The semi finals were full games of Battlegroup™ requiring
the extra skills of fleet management and target selection in early rounds to
eliminate capable enemy ships such as the Yamato
and the Essex before they can do long term
damage. At the end of the semi finals Fred Gosnell and Chris Czyryca had been
eliminated. Although both players kept it close Fred’s dice deserted him
against Andrew and Marc survived a perfectly timed airstrike by Chris just
beating the former Champion.
The finals opened with Marc Baeuregard playing the Allies and
Andrew Fedin playing the Axis. Marc started with a night base raid that sank
the Ise and the Kirishima.
Andrew responded with an air strike that took out the Lexington. With Marc
still refitting his forces, Andrew successfully launched a night invasion
sortie and sank the Texas and the
Maryland. Now in serious trouble Marc chanced a submarine attack on
Zuikaku and sank the big carrier with torpedoes. From then on both
players were looking for any advantage they could get with Marc sinking the
Soryu and Hiryu, seriously denting the
Axis carrier capability. Andrew sank the Nelson,
Hermes and King George V in a
series of counter punches. Finally Marc knowing he was behind made a last
minute night sortie against the Japanese battleship Yamashiro
and sank same. The final score of round one was 60 to 57 with Marc snatching
the win.
The second round of the finals saw Andrew shift his target
selection with devastating effect. Neither side was able to win any sorties,
the round slid into an attrition fight that Andrew won. Marc sank the
Haruna, Conte di Cavour,
Caio Duilio, Guilo Cesare and the
aircraft carrier Kaga. Andrew sank the
Hornet, Hood, Bearn,
Washington and the
Enterprise. It was a bad week for the US Fleet carriers. With the
finals tied at one win each the Battlegroup championship was coming to
the last hand. Marc started with a day convoy sortie that quickly sank the
Roma and the Zuiho. Andrew managed to
sink the Bretagne in the exchange. From that point on Marc began to dominate
the day light sorties with precision airstrikes from his remaining big
carriers. Over the course of the game Marc sank the
Andrea Doria, Mutsu,
Shokaku, Nagato and
Littorio. Andrew picked off the Alabama
during a night sortie and the Mississippi and
Warspite. But in the end it was Marc gaining
control of the air that was source of Andrew’s demise.
It is good to see strong experienced players, consistently
reach the finals. It is also good to see that even new players can get within
reach of a championship. Congratualtions to Marc Baeuregard for his
victory as the Battlegroup 2007 - World Boardgaming Champion.
This just in! Battlegroup™ has
been nominated to join WBC's Century Events. Only the top 105 games are
selected for this status. WBC members have until December 31, 2007 to
vote their favorite Century Events.
67th Guards Rifle Division
By Phil Gardocki
In Support of our soon to be released
Battlelines™ Kursk series.
The 67th Guards Rifle was certainly a unit that deserved its
"Guards" status. It also was either the unluckiest division to have been
involved in so many historic battles, or the luckiest to have survived them
all.
Organizational History 1941
In July 1941, the 304th Rifle Division was formed from the remains of the 109th
Mechanized Division, and a newly called up 807th Rifle regiment. The
organization was organized under the July 1941 Shtat, or Table of Organization.
This was the standard organization of 3 rifle regiments with supporting mortars
and light anti-tank guns. Attached to this organization was an artillery
regiment with 8 12.2 cm howitzers and 24 7.62cm howitzers. With 16
more 7.62cm assigned to the antitank battalion and rifle
regiments. These guns had a smaller caliber, lower throw weight and
shorter range than their German counterparts. Supporting battalions included a
medium anti-tank battalion with its 4.5cm anti-tank guns, and 1.27 anti-tank
rifles, and an engineer battalion. But as the 109th Mechanized was also a
recent expansion division. It did not have any of the tanks, trucks, or
tractors of a mechanized division, and what little equipment the 109th and the
subsequent 304th did have was lost in the hasty retreats of the summer of 1941.
It was doubtful the 304th had much in artillery and any support assets when it
deployed.
|
10,652 Men
6 3.7cm Antiaircraft Guns
8 12.2cm M1910/30 Howitzers
24 4.5cm Antitank Guns
40 7.62cm Cannons
54 5 cm Mortars
439 Machineguns
2 Cars
3 Trucks
311 Wagons
|

|
As the winter battles of 1941/1942 wound
down, the 304th Rifle received large numbers of equipment and personnel
replacements, and was reorganized according to the December, 1941 Shtat,
as follows:
|
12,017 Men
6 3.7cm Antiaircraft Guns
8 12.2cm M1910/30 Howitzers
12 12cm Mortars
24 4.5cm Antitank Guns
24 7.62cm Cannons
40 5cm Mortars
402 Machineguns
1 Car
5 Trucks
351 Wagons
|

|
In equipment, with the exception of trucks and tractors, the division was
probably fairly close to 90%, and in manpower, around 80%. The
interesting change in this model division was an attempt to streamline the
communications between the artillery and the infantry. This was done by
assigning 4 12.2 cm mortars as regiment assets.
But from early Summer, 1942 to Winter 1942, the 304th Rifle was
constantly engaged and was reduced to a small percentage of its original size.
With heavy reinforcements, the division was rebuilt in place and rewarded for
its efforts by being redesignated as the 67th Guards Rifle Division, and
brought mostly up to strength. The division then was structured to the December
1942 Guards Rifle Shtat.
-
11,326 Men
-
6 3.7cm Antiaircraft Guns
-
12 12.2cm/37 M1938 Howitzers
-
24 16cm Mortars
-
50 5 cm Mortars
-
52 7.62cm Cannons
-
81 8.2cm Mortars
-
619 Machineguns
-
1 Car
-
4 Trucks
-
471 Wagons
|

|
Changes in the division after 1943 were mostly equipment in nature. The
antitank battalion was upgraded to 5.7cm guns and SU-76's, while the rifle
regiments had their 12.2 cm mortars upgraded to 16cm mortars.
-
10,426 Men
-
8 SU-76's
-
6 3.7cm Antiaircraft Guns
-
12 12.2cm/37 M1938 Howitzers
-
24 5.7cm ZIS-2's
-
32 7.62cm Cannons
-
36 16cm Mortars
-
81 8.2cm Mortars
-
494 Machineguns
-
1 Car
-
4 Trucks
-
479 Wagons
|

|
Operational History
Ad_Map_Cher_Ami.xml
Born in the desperate days of July, 1941, the 304th Rifle
Division was manned by remnants of 109th Mechanized Division, recently called
up reservists, and whatever men and equipment it could scavenge on the long
retreat from the advancing forces of Army Group South. The 304th had a talent
for getting out of trouble, and evaded destruction on the retreat, and the
encirclement at Kiev.
Assigned to the Southwest Front's 38th Army, the 304th fought on
the southern flank during the German Operation Typhoon, a.k.a the Battle of
Moscow, and participated in the Soviet winter offensives until the 1942rasputitsa,
or mud season.
In May, 1942, the 304th Rifle participated in the 2nd Battle for Kharkov.
Unfortunately, that offensive met the German 6th Army and surrounded
by the 1st and 4th Panzer Armies. Once again the 304th showed its talent for
fighting withdrawal and escaped being pocketed by the German forces and began
the long hard march towards the river Don.
In November, 1942, and under the Don Front's 65th Army, and with
snow falling heavily, the 304th fought off the last attempt to drive it into
the river, and with the start of Operation Uranus, began the offensive that
would eventually lead to the encirclement of Field Marshal von Paulus' 6th
German Army at Stalingrad.
On January 21st, 1943, the 304th was redesignated as the 67th
Guards Rifle Division. After 5 months of heavy rebuild and training, the 67th
Guards was assigned to the Vorozneth Front, 6th Guards Army, itself
recently redesignated from the 21st Army, 22nd Guards Rifle Corps. The
67th Guards Rifle, along with the two regiments of the 28th Antitank
Brigade, was assigned to defend the town of Cherkasskoyle.
On July 5th, the 67th Guards Rifle was attacked by the German
Panzer Grenadier Division Grossdeutschland, along with the part of the
10th Panzer Brigade (the rest suffering mechanical failure and mine damage) and
elements of the 11th Panzer Division. After a day
of heavy fighting, the 67th Guards Rifle retreated from its positions. Taking
advantage of a river crossing and some hills, the 67th Guards Rifle took up new
positions. But the 67th Guards Rifle was flanked and penetrated and forced back
again. At this time, Grossdeutschland, along with the 3rd Panzer Division and
the 11th Panzer Division, was engaged by Soviet armored forces, including
the 3rd Mechanized Corps and the 31st Tank Corps, and the 67th was not
pursued.
For rest of 1943, the 67th participated in the many of the
battles to liberate the Ukraine. During the winter, the 6th Guards Army,
the 67th Guards Rifle included, was railed north and transferred to the
1st Baltic Front.
On 23 June, 1944, the 67th Guards Rifle, now assigned to the
23rd Corps, 6th Guards Army participated in Operation Bagration. The 67th
was one of the hammers that was used against Germany's 205th and 252nd Infantry
Divisions of the 3rd Panzer Army. It was an operation that would crush
Army Group Center, narrowly cut off Army Group North, and throw the Germans
back to Poland.
By October, the winter campaigns were starting, and
the 67th, participated in operations in the Baltic States that
succeeded in cutting off Army Group North's 16th Army and 18th Army, now
trapped in Latvia. The reduction of this pocket was not deemed a high
priority, and the 67th spent the rest of its career isolating the 18th Army in
well deserved, albeit relative peace.
back to top
The Armor Pages
By Phil Gardocki
The Panzerkampfwagon IV
 |
| Panzer IV Ausf 'G'
|
As photographed by the author.
Used with permission from the US Army Ordnance Museum.
|
Of all the tanks of World War II, the Panzer IV was probably the
most successful model. The original design intent of
this panzer was to both provide a heavily armored spear point for an
armored attack and for infantry support. It's armor was about as thick as that
of the Panzer III, but with a broader turret
ring that could support short barreled 7.5 cm gun required to blow up obstacles
in their path. Behind the spearpoint would come the main
battle tank, the Panzer III to engage enemy tanks.
It was that broader chassis that allowed the long series of
upgrades that turned the Panzer IV into the longest lived, most heavily
produced tank in the German army.
The prewar versions of the Panzer IV, ausf A through F1
were all armed with the 7.5cm/L24 gun. But this only had a penetration of
5.8cm of armor at 500 meters. During the battle for France, this gun was
found to be useless against the French Char B, and British Matilda tanks.
In late 1940 and early 1941 prototypes were made with both a 5 cm/L60 and the
7.5 cm L34. Neither of which were very promising in light of encounters
with current British and Soviet models. By March, 1942, production models
of version F2 were outfitted with the longer barrel L40 gun and sent to all
fronts to the desperate panzer units.
The reason for the long delay in up gunning the model rests with
the production requirements for a large gun. Most of the industrial
effort is producing the a rifled barrel. All other parts of a gun can be
created with easily mass produced parts, but the barrel takes specialized
machinery. The 7.5cm barrel was needed in a number of weapons, including
the light infantry gun, at 6 per infantry battalion, Sturmgeschutz, and the PAK
40 antitank gun. And despite efforts that more than doubled production
every year of this popular caliber, supply never kept up with demand.
As time went on, the Panzer IV was upgraded to 8 cm of
armor, and a 7.5cm/L48 that could penetrate 12.7cm of armor at 500 meters. The
chassis for the Panzer IV was used for a number of other vehicles, including
the STG-IV, the Hummel, Jadgpanzer IV, Sturmhaubitze, Brummbar, and the
Nashorn.
| Specification |
Specification |
Specification |
| Gun |
7.5cm L24 |
Gun |
7.5cm L40 |
Gun |
7.5cm L48 |
| 40Weight |
18-22 tonnes |
Weight |
23 tonnes |
Weight |
25 tonnes |
| Max Hull Armor |
3-5 cm |
Max Hull Armor |
5-8 cm |
Max Hull Armor |
8 cm |
| Max Turret Armor |
3-5 cm |
Max Turret Armor |
5-8 cm |
Max Turret Armor |
8 cm |
| Fuel |
Gasoline |
Fuel |
Gasoline |
Fuel |
Gasoline |
| Horsepower |
250-300hp |
Horsepower |
300hp |
Horsepower |
300hp |
| Top Speed |
42 kph |
Top Speed |
38 kph |
Top Speed |
38 kph |
| Crew |
5 |
Crew |
5 |
Crew |
5 |
 |
| Jadgpanzer IV
|
As photographed by the author.
Used with permission from the US Army Ordnance Museum.
|
 |
| Brummbar, or Grizzly Bear
|
| A powerfull assult gun, the Brummbar sported
an 15cm L/12 gun.
|
As photographed by the author.
Used with permission from the US Army Ordnance Museum.
|
 |
|
Sturmgeschutz III
|
As photographed by the author.
Used with permission from the US Army Ordnance Museum.
|
 |
| The Hornisse, or Hornet, later known as
Nashorn, or Rhino
|
|
Armed with a long 8.8cm/L71 cm gun.
|
As photographed by the author.
Used with permission from the US Army Ordnance Museum.
|
|
|